Moderator: Andrew
bugsymalone wrote:I think everyone is reading WAY too much into her comment about "the lead singer of Styx." I would imagine it was in reference to the subjects covered in the article. Simply used as an identifying point.
Bugsy
IRRELEVENT
sadie65 wrote:bugsymalone wrote:I think everyone is reading WAY too much into her comment about "the lead singer of Styx." I would imagine it was in reference to the subjects covered in the article. Simply used as an identifying point.
Bugsy
And that's what I was trying to say. Simply that it was easier to identify herself that way, rather than go into detail. Just my take.
Carry on arguing though...
If not, could this be the first time that Styx was mentioned in RS and it WASN'T negative?
bugsymalone wrote:If not, could this be the first time that Styx was mentioned in RS and it WASN'T negative?
LOL!!! You read my mind, EE!!!
I did not read the article, but I think Styx was probably not a part of it, in keeping with how that magazine has always operated.
Bugsy
classicstyxfan wrote:Adam said :
Think about it. "Classic Rock"?????
20 years from now I doubt the term "classic rock" will be remembered, much less "RELEVENT".
Classic says: in 20 years ( or sooner ) They'll just change the name.....
it will be called Oldies !!!!
evileyes wrote:sadie65 wrote:bugsymalone wrote:Did it mention Styx? If not, could this be the first time that Styx was mentioned in RS and it WASN'T negative?
Abitaman wrote:evileyes wrote:sadie65 wrote:bugsymalone wrote:Did it mention Styx? If not, could this be the first time that Styx was mentioned in RS and it WASN'T negative?
That would be a miracle-ERIC
classicstyxfan wrote:Classic says: in 20 years ( or sooner ) They'll just change the name.....it will be called Oldies !!!!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests